Relational and Sexual Costs of Materialism in Couple Relationships: An Actor–Partner Longitudinal Study

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examined the relational and sexual costs of materialism in couple relationships. Path analyses utilizing an actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) based on social comparison theory longitudinally predicted relationships across three waves of data over two years. Respondents included 338 couples (married and cohabiting) who participated in three waves of the (Day et al. 2016) Project. Women’s goods materialism at Time 2 was also directly related to their own (positively) and their partner’s (negatively) sexual satisfaction at Time 3. Men’s image materialism at Time 2 was directly and negatively related to their own commitment at Time 2 and their goods materialism at Time 2 was directly and negatively related to their own Time 2 relationship satisfaction. We also identified negative indirect associations between men’s T2 image and goods materialism and men’s and women’s T3 relationship satisfaction. This study provided evidence of the concurrent and longitudinal associations of materialism and relationship and sexual satisfaction using dyadic data. Implications for family life educators and therapists are explored.

References Powered by Scopus

13321Citations
8493Readers
Get full text
1849Citations
918Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leavitt, C. E., Dew, J. P., Allsop, D. B., Runyan, S. D., & Hill, E. J. (2019). Relational and Sexual Costs of Materialism in Couple Relationships: An Actor–Partner Longitudinal Study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 40(3), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-019-09617-3

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

33%

Psychology 2

22%

Decision Sciences 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0