Federalist No. 70: Can the Public Service Survive in the Contest Between Hamilton's Aspirations and Madison's Reality?

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Federalist No. 70 is widely viewed as a sweeping description and defense of the need for energy in the executive. This essay begins this detailed examination of Federalist No. 70 by comparing Alexander Hamilton's ideals with James Madison's more cautionary exposition on separated powers. According to the author, Hamilton's notion of a public service driven by honor eventually was undermined by partisanship and congressional prerogatives expressed in the rise of a "businesslike" path away from corruption and waste. The essay concludes with a brief description of a "counterfactual" revision to Federalist No. 70 containing a conception of good public service with a capacity to resist the incursions of expanding democratization and political parties. © 2011 The American Society for Public Administration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arnold, P. E. (2011). Federalist No. 70: Can the Public Service Survive in the Contest Between Hamilton’s Aspirations and Madison’s Reality? Public Administration Review, 71(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02469.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free