WEAK SEPARABILITY AND A TEST FOR THE SPECIFICATION OF INCOME IN DEMAND MODELS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE DEMAND FOR MEAT IN AUSTRALIA

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most studies of the demand for meat in Australia have used some measure of total income or expenditure, but two recent studies have assumed weak separability of a meat group and used expenditure on the meat group instead. These specification differences are of interest to the extent that they affect the economic interpretation, goodness‐of‐fit, elasticity estimates, predictive performance or hypothesis tests in empirical demand equations. In this paper, non‐nested hypothesis testing procedures are used to test the alternative specifications of the income variable and the hypothesis of separability. The results favour the use of the expenditure variable implied by separability but are mixed concerning whether separability holds. 1987 The Australian Agricultural Economics Society

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The travel cost model of recreation demand: Theoretical and empirical issues

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating a demand system with nonnegativity constraints: Mexican meat demand

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An application of maximum entropy estimation: The demand for meat in the United Kingdom

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alston, J. M., & Chalfant, J. A. (1987). WEAK SEPARABILITY AND A TEST FOR THE SPECIFICATION OF INCOME IN DEMAND MODELS WITH AN APPLICATION TO THE DEMAND FOR MEAT IN AUSTRALIA. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.1987.tb00456.x

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘22‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6

67%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Philosophy 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0