Development of sequencing-based methodologies to distinguish viable from non-viable cells in a bovine milk matrix: A pilot study

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although high-throughput DNA sequencing-based methods have been of great value for determining the composition of microbial communities in various environments, there is the potential for inaccuracies arising from the sequencing of DNA from dead microorganisms. In this pilot study, we compared different sequencing-based methods to assess their relative accuracy with respect to distinguishing between viable and non-viable cells, using a live and heat-inactivated model community spiked into bovine milk. The methods used were shotgun metagenomics with and without propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment, RNA-based 16S rRNA sequencing and metatranscriptomics. The results showed that methods were generally accurate, though significant differences were found depending on the library types and sequencing technologies. Different molecular targets were the basis for variations in the results generated using different library types, while differences in the derived composition data from Oxford Nanopore Technologies-and Illumina-based sequencing likely reflect a combination of different sequencing depths, error rates and bioinformatics pipelines. Although PMA was successfully applied in this study, further optimisation is required before it can be applied in a more universal context for complex microbiomes. Overall, these methods show promise and represent another important step towards the ultimate establishment of approaches that can be applied to accurately identify live microorganisms in milk and other food niches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yap, M., O’Sullivan, O., O’Toole, P. W., & Cotter, P. D. (2022). Development of sequencing-based methodologies to distinguish viable from non-viable cells in a bovine milk matrix: A pilot study. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1036643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free