Applicability of the ankle-brachial-index measurement as screening device for high cardiovascular risk: An observational study

10Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Screening with ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement could be clinically relevant to avoid cardiovascular events in subjects with asymptomatic atherosclerosis. To assess the practical impact of guidelines regarding the use of ABI as a screening tool in general practice, the corresponding number needed to screen, including the required time investment, and the feasibility of ABI performance, was assessed.Methods: An observational study was performed in the setting of 955 general practices in the Netherlands. Overall, 13,038 subjects of ≥55 years presenting with symptoms of intermittent claudication and/or presenting with ≥ one vascular risk factor were included. Several guidelines recommend the ABI as an additional measurement in selected populations for risk assessment for cardiovascular morbidity.Results: Screening of the overall population of ≥50 years results in ≈862 subjects per general practice who should be screened, resulting in a time-requirement of approximately 6 weeks of full time work. Using an existing clinical prediction model, 247 patients per general practice should be screened for PAD by ABI measurement.Conclusion: Screening the entire population of ≥50 years will in our opinion not be feasible in general practice. A more rationale and efficient approach might be screening of subsets of the population of ≥55 years based on a clinical prediction model. © 2012 Bendermacher et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bendermacher, B. L. W., Teijink, J. A. W., Willigendael, E. M., Bartelink, M. L., Peters, R. J. G., Langenberg, M., … Prins, M. H. (2012). Applicability of the ankle-brachial-index measurement as screening device for high cardiovascular risk: An observational study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-12-59

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free