Competing Values and Evidence: How Do We Evaluate Mandated Reporting and CPS Response?

7Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Child protection policy relative to mandated reporting is analyzed in this chapter, beginning with a review of general values and goals in child welfare as found in international, national, and regional policy and law. We then use the best available empirical evidence to address a set of long-standing but largely flawed assumptions pertaining to the issue of mandated reporting. We discuss current services available in child protection, with an emphasis on emerging practices for children served in their homes. Finally, we conclude with a number of suggestions for future research and policy developments in this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drake, B., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2015). Competing Values and Evidence: How Do We Evaluate Mandated Reporting and CPS Response? In Child Maltreatment: Contemporary Issues in Research and Policy (Vol. 4, pp. 33–60). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9685-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free