Reduced fishmeal allowance with constant protein input for juvenile channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus

0Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated different dietary fishmeal and protein levels on growth performance, intestinal structure and intestinal microbial community of juvenile channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. A total of 1800 fish distributed into 36 tanks were fed with nine different diets containing three protein levels (300, 330 and 360 g/kg) with three fishmeal (FM) levels (0, 30 and 60 g/kg) for 90 days. The results showed that significant interactions between the protein level and FM level were observed in final weight (FW), weight gain (WG), Na + , K + -ATPase and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) activities. The significant lowest FW, WG, Na + , K + -ATPase and AKP activities were observed in fish fed with no fishmeal and 300 g/kg protein dietary while the highest were shown in 60 g/kg fishmeal and 330 g/kg protein treatment. Additionally, the microvillar length of the mid-intestine in catfish was significantly affected by the interaction between dietary protein level and fishmeal level. The intestinal samples were dominated by three major phyla, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria. Genera Romboutsia and Turicibacter accounted for probably 800 g/kg of the phylum Firmicutes; meanwhile, genus Cetobacterium represented more than 900 g/kg of the phylum Fusobacteria. In conclusion, this study indicated that channel catfish juveniles can be fed with a practical diet without fishmeal as long as the protein level increased to 360 g/kg; however, if the percentage of dietary protein was 300 g/kg, it seemed that fishmeal need to be supplied as a protein source.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, G. Z., Li, Z. Q., Tian, H. Y., Jia, E. T., Xu, C., & Liu, W. B. (2019). Reduced fishmeal allowance with constant protein input for juvenile channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus. Aquaculture Nutrition, 25(1), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free