Long-term efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in chinese patients with recent-onset schizophrenia

3Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The subgroup analysis of a primary study (NCT01051531) evaluated the effect of long-term paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) therapy in Chinese patients with recent-onset schizophrenia responding unsatisfactorily to previous oral antipsychotics. Patients and methods: This 18-month, open-label study consisted of 3 phases-screening (7 days), treatment (18 months) and end-of-study/withdrawal visit. All enrolled patients (18-50 years) received PP1M: 150 mg eq. (day 1), 100 mg eq. (day 8) followed by a oncemonthly flexible dose (50, 75, 100 or 150 mg eq.). Efficacy and safety were assessed. Results: Among the 118 enrolled Chinese patients, 68 completed the treatment (mean age: 25.6 years; male: 54.7%). A clinically meaningful change from baseline to day 548 was observed in Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (primary endpoint, mean [SD]: −15.3 [20.76]), Personal and Social Performance scale (15.9 [19.65]), Clinician Global Impressionschizophrenia score (−1.2 [1.54]) and Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire score (0.9 [1.73]). Commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included insomnia (13.9%), injection-site pain (13.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (13.0%), restlessness (13.0%) and akathisia (13.0%). Serious TEAEs were reported in 9.3% patients with schizophrenia being most common (6.5%) and one death (suicide) was observed. Conclusion: Efficacy of PP1M corroborate findings from earlier studies and no new safety concerns emerged in this Chinese subgroup of patients with schizophrenia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Si, T., Zhuo, J., Feng, Y., Lu, H., Hong, D., & Zhang, L. (2019). Long-term efficacy and safety of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in chinese patients with recent-onset schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 15, 1685–1694. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S191803

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free