When should one subtract background fluorescence in 2-color microarrays?

27Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two-color microarrays are a powerful tool for genomic analysis, but have noise components that make inferences regarding gene expression inefficient and potentially misleading. Background fluorescence, whether attributable to nonspecific binding or other sources, is an important component of noise. The decision to subtract fluorescence surrounding spots of hybridization from spot fluorescence has been controversial, with no clear criteria for determining circumstances that may favor, or disfavor, background subtraction. While it is generally accepted that subtracting background reduces bias but increases variance in the estimates of the ratios of interest, no formal analysis of the bias-variance trade off of background subtraction has been undertaken. In this paper, we use simulation to systematically examine the bias-variance trade off under a variety of possible experimental conditions. Our simulation is based on data obtained from 2 self versus self microarray experiments and is free of distributional assumptions. Our results identify factors that are important for determining whether to background subtract, including the correlation of foreground to background intensity ratios. Using these results, we develop recommendations for diagnostic visualizations that can help decisions about background subtraction.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scharpf, R. B., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Sneddon, J. B., & Parmigiani, G. (2007). When should one subtract background fluorescence in 2-color microarrays? Biostatistics, 8(4), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxl041

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free