Retrieval of nitric oxide in the mesosphere from SCIAMACHY nominal limb spectra

9Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a retrieval algorithm for nitric oxide (NO) number densities from measurements from the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY, on Envisat) nominal limb mode (0-91km). The NO number densities are derived from atmospheric emissions in the gamma bands in the range 230-300nm, measured by the SCIAMACHY ultra-violet (UV) channel 1. The retrieval is adapted from the mesosphere and lower thermosphere mode (MLT, 50-150km) NO retrieval (Bender et al., 2013), including the same 3-D ray tracing, 2-D retrieval grid, and regularisations with respect to altitude and latitude. Since the nominal mode limb scans extend only to about 91km, we use NO densities in the lower thermosphere (above 92km), derived from empirical models, as a priori input. The priors are the Nitric Oxide Empirical Model (NOEM; Marsh et al., 2004) and a regression model derived from the MLT NO data comparison (Bender et al., 2015). Our algorithm yields plausible NO number densities from 60 to 85km from the SCIAMACHY nominal limb mode scans. Using a priori input substantially reduces the incorrect attribution of NO from the lower thermosphere, where no direct limb measurements are available. The vertical resolution lies between 5 and 10km in the altitude range 65-80km. Analysing all SCIAMACHY nominal limb scans provides almost 10 years (from August 2002 to April 2012) of daily NO measurements in this altitude range. This provides a unique data record of NO in the upper atmosphere and is invaluable for constraining NO in the mesosphere, in particular for testing and validating chemistry climate models during this period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bender, S., Sinnhuber, M., Langowski, M., & Burrows, J. P. (2017). Retrieval of nitric oxide in the mesosphere from SCIAMACHY nominal limb spectra. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 10(1), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-209-2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free