We report data from an eye tracking experiment on the repeated name penalty effect in 9-year-old children and young adults. The repeated name penalty effect is informative for the study of children’s reading because it allows conclusions about children’s ability to direct attention to discourse-level processing cues during reading. We presented children and adults simple three-sentence stories with a single referent, which was referred to by an anaphor—either a pronoun or a repeated name—downstream in the text. The anaphor was either near or far from the antecedent. We found a repeated name penalty effect in early processing for children as well as adults, suggesting that beginning readers are already susceptible to discourse-level expectations of anaphora during reading. Furthermore, children’s reading was more influenced by the distance of anaphor and antecedent than adults’, which we attribute to differences in reading fluency and the resulting cognitive load during reading.
CITATION STYLE
Eilers, S., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2019). The repeated name penalty effect in children’s natural reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818757712
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.