Habitat diversity and the species-area relationship: alternative models and tests

102Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Reviews a variety of models which have sought to account for species-area relationships: passive sampling models; fragmentation models (immigration, extinction, keystone species, allopatric species and complete disturbance models); habitat diversity models (partial disturbance, edge/centre habitat, specific habitat and probabilistic habitat models); and species-area curves resulting from heterogeneity-area relationships. Protocols for separating causal mechanisms are discussed. An example demonstrates that straightforward relationships between habitat diversity and species richness may be complicated by non-random dispersion patterns of individual species, and by differences among habitats in the density, species richness and habitat specificity of organisms. Explicit specification and testing of alternative explanations for species-area effects will result in greater understanding of this phenomenon. -P.J.Jarvis

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hart, D. D., & Horwitz, R. J. (1991). Habitat diversity and the species-area relationship: alternative models and tests. Habitat Structure, 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3076-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free