Two critical issues in quantitative modeling of communicable diseases: Inference of unobservables and dependent happening

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss two critical issues which must be remembered whenever we examine epidemiologic data of directly transmitted infectious diseases. Firstly, we would like the readers to recognize the difference between observable and unobservable events in infectious disease epidemiology. Since both infection event and acquisition of infectiousness are generally not directly observable, the total number of infected individuals could not be counted at a point of time, unless very rigorous contact tracing and microbiological examinations were performed. Directly observable intrinsic parameters, such as the incubation period and serial interval, play key roles in translating observable to unobservable information. Secondly, the concept of dependent happening must be remembered to identify a risk of an infectious disease or to assess vaccine efficacy. Observation of a single infected individual is not independent of observing other individuals. A simple solution for dependent happening is to employ the transmission probability which is conditioned on an exposure to infection. © 2009 Springer Netherlands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nishiura, H., Kakehashi, M., & Inaba, H. (2009). Two critical issues in quantitative modeling of communicable diseases: Inference of unobservables and dependent happening. In Mathematical and Statistical Estimation Approaches in Epidemiology (pp. 53–87). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2313-1_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free