Histochemical and immunohistochemical detection of neurons that produce nitric oxide: Effect of different fixative parameters and immunoreactivity against non-neuronal NOS antisera

51Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study focused on two points concerning the histochemical and immunohistochemical detection of neurons that product nitric oxide (NO): (a) the effect of fixation and other methodological parameters on the staining pattern of both NADPH-diaphorase (NADPH-d) histochemistry and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) immunohistochemistry, and (b) the possibility that neurons display immunoreactivity against NOS antisera obtained from non-neuronal sources. Frontal sections of rat brains, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde according to different protocols, were processed for single and double labeling using NADPH-d histochemistry and neuronal (nNOS), macrophagic (macNOS), and endothelial (eNOS) NOS immunohistochemistry. Our results show that variations in the fixative schedule, even within standard parameters, produce qualitative and quantitative changes in NADPH-d labeling. The effect of fixative on weakly stained neurons is different from that on heavily stained neurons. In subfixed brains, a large number of NOS-positive neurons lose their NADPH-d activity, whereas NOS immunolabeling remains unaltered. This finding may be particularly interesting in morphological studies that compare NADPH-d activity under experimental conditions that can affect brain perfusion. On the other hand, many cortical and subcortical neurons show macNOS immunoreactivity, most of it colocalized with nNOS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonzalez-Hernandez, T., De La Cruz, M. A. P., & Mantolan-Sarmiento, B. (1996). Histochemical and immunohistochemical detection of neurons that produce nitric oxide: Effect of different fixative parameters and immunoreactivity against non-neuronal NOS antisera. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 44(12), 1399–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/44.12.8985132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free