Bumble Bee Avoidance of Argentine Ants and Associated Chemical Cues

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bees provide pollination services in both agricultural and natural ecosystems. However, invasive ants that exploit floral nectar in these landscapes can compete with bees for resources, with implications for pollinator resource acquisition, plant fitness, and, ultimately, ecosystem function. While interference competition has been described between bees and nectivorous, non-pollinator antagonists, the behaviors and sensory mechanisms involved remain largely unresolved. Here, we studied the mechanisms by which invasive Argentine ants influence bee nectar foraging behavior. In a series of laboratory assays, we assessed the foraging behavior of bumble bees (Bombus impatiens) in response to live Argentine ants (Linepithema humile) or to a subset of ant chemical cues. Bees were clearly deterred by live ants at a nectar source: they consumed less, fed less frequently, and fed for a shorter duration when live ants were present. Bees were also deterred by a combination of olfactory and gustatory ant chemical cues, consistent with both innate and learned avoidance behavior. Naïve and ant-experienced bees were deterred through chemosensation of ants, feeding less from nectar infused with ant chemicals as compared to nectar lacking ants or their associated cues. Some ant-experienced bees showed a unique behavior, displaying aggression toward ants as well as in response to ant chemicals. The marked effects of this invasive ant on bee foraging behavior—through physical interaction and chemical cues—highlights Argentine ants as a serious pest whose control should be considered when developing pollinator conservation and management strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miner, M. C., & Wilson Rankin, E. E. (2023). Bumble Bee Avoidance of Argentine Ants and Associated Chemical Cues. Journal of Insect Behavior, 36(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-023-09815-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free