Evaluation of the anti-complement immunofluorescence test for detection of antibody to varicella-zoster virus

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The anticomplement immunofluorescence (ACIF) test was compared with complement fixation and fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen procedures for the detection of antibody to varicella-zoster virus. All of 50 sera from pregnant women contained antibody measured by ACIF (titer, ≥1:10); only 27 (54%) were positive by complement fixation (P < 0.01). For 16 paired sera obtained before and after varicella-zoster virus infection and tested by ACIF and fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen, the results agreed in 27 determinations (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 81%). Of 99 sera submitted for routine determinations of immune status to the virus, 89 showed comparable results for both tests (sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 88%). The ACIF test offers a specific and sensitive alternative to the fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen procedure for the detection of antibody to varicella-zoster virus. In addition, the ACIF test is rapid, easy to perform, and uses commercially available reagents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Preissner, C. M., Steinberg, S. P., Gershon, A. A., & Smith, T. F. (1982). Evaluation of the anti-complement immunofluorescence test for detection of antibody to varicella-zoster virus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 16(2), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.16.2.373-376.1982

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free