Die G8-Reform in Baden-Württemberg: Kompetenzen, Wohlbefinden und Freizeitverhalten vor und nach der Reform

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The introduction of the eight-year high school stream was considered controversial by politicians and the public, partially because of the lack of empirical data supporting the decision. The present study compared students from G8 and G9 cohorts in Baden-Württemberg regarding cognitive variables such as competence in mathematics, English reading, physics and biology as well as non-cognitive outcomes such as school related stress, health problems and leisure time activities. Based on representative data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS; Add-on-Study Baden-Württemberg), students from four cohorts spanning 2011 to 2013 were compared. In regard to the subject-specific competences we found no differences between students from G8 and G9 cohorts in mathematics and physics, minor disadvantages for G8 students in biology and the largest disadvantage for G8 students in English reading achievement. Concerning stress and health problems we found disadvantages for G8 students, whereas effects for leisure time use remained inconsistent. Interpretations of the findings and possible implications are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hübner, N., Wagner, W., Kramer, J., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2017). Die G8-Reform in Baden-Württemberg: Kompetenzen, Wohlbefinden und Freizeitverhalten vor und nach der Reform. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(4), 748–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-017-0737-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free