Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms

  • Epstein M
  • Kupferman R
  • Maor C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Copyright © 2019, arXiv, All rights reserved. The 1950's foundational literature on rational mechanics exhibits two somewhat distinct paradigms to the representation of continuous distributions of defects in solids. In one paradigm, the fundamental objects are geometric structures on the body manifold, e.g., an affine connection and a Riemannian metric, which represent its internal microstructure. In the other paradigm, the fundamental object is the constitutive relation; if the constitutive relations satisfy a property of material uniformity, then it induces certain geometric structures on the manifold. In this paper, we first review these paradigms, and show that they are to some extent equivalent. We then consider bodies with continuously-distributed edge dislocations, and show, in both paradigms, how they can be obtained as homogenization limits of bodieswith finitely-many dislocations as the number of dislocations tends to infinity. Homogenization in the geometric paradigm amounts to a convergence of manifolds; in the constitutive paradigm it amounts to a Γ- convergence of energy functionals. We show that these two homogenization theories are consistent, and even identical in the case of constitutive relations having discrete symmetries.MSC Codes 74Q05, 74A20, 53Z05

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Epstein, M., Kupferman, R., & Maor, C. (2020). Limits of Distributed Dislocations in Geometric and Constitutive Paradigms (pp. 349–380). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42683-5_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free