we estimate the scalp and skull conductivities on two healthy adults, based on bounded (or parametric) Electrical Impedance Tomography (bEIT) measurements, and using 62 current injection pairs of a high dense 128 sensor array. We compare the estimates obtained with three different electrode models: pointwise, volumetric, and the Complete Electrode Model (CEM). We also analyze the influence of the skull details and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The estimated scalp (skull) conductivities for these two subjects were ~0.4 and ~0.3 S/m (~0.0045 and ~0.005 S/m), similar for all three electrode models (within 8%). Volumetric and CEM models resulted in a better fit to real data. A model of nested and closed surfaces (no skull holes) resulted in a significant overestimation (~23%) of the skull conductivity. Moreover, neglecting the CSF resulted in an extra 28% overestimation of the skull conductivity. This clearly shows the need of precise head modeling for bEIT.
CITATION STYLE
Fernández-Corazza, M., Turovets, S., Govyadinov, P., Muravchik, C. H., & Tucker, D. (2016). Effects of head model inaccuracies on regional scalp and skull conductivity estimation using real EIT measurements. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 54, pp. 5–8). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-928-8_2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.