M25 Oxygen: Too much of a good thing? Can simulation improve education?

  • Parkin J
  • Lloyd E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A cohort of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients experience acute exacerbations (AECOPD) presenting with worsening sputum production, cough and breathlessness. The recommended treatment for AECOPD involves using a 28% Venturi mask to achieve an arterial oxygen saturation of 88‐92%. These guidelines have been poorly adhered to with many health professionals still administering high flow oxygen. An AECOPD model, created on the human patient simulator, was administered with 28% or 100% oxygen. 28% oxygen relieved hypoxia (PaO2 = 84.9 mmHg), caused mild hypercapnia (PaCO2 = 49.6 mmHg) and the blood pH was normal (pH = 7.37). 100% oxygen enabled better arterial oxygenation (PaO2 = 129.3 mmHg) but caused severe hypercapnia (PaCO2 = 100.9 mmHg) and acidosis (pH = 6.98). Preclinical medical students were randomly allocated to simulation or lecture‐based learning (the study has a crossover design) and were taught the correct use of oxygen administration. A greater proportion of students rated they had an excellent understanding of the key learning points after simulation (100%) compared to the lecture‐ based learning (33%) and it was sufficient to significantly improve test scores (p = 0.0135). Simulation could be used to educate future health professionals in using 28% oxygen to reduce the risk of hypercapnic respiratory acidosis in AECOPD. (Figure Presented).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parkin, J., & Lloyd, E. (2015). M25 Oxygen: Too much of a good thing? Can simulation improve education? Thorax, 70(Suppl 3), A237.2-A238. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207770.452

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free