Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment

11Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the difference in motion profiles between instrumented and non-instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine.. Method: In vivo retrospective radiological analysis of dynamic (flexion-extension) lateral plain films was performed in different lumbar spine fusion types. Twenty-eight patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery at the L4/5 level. Fourteen patients underwent anterior fusion surgery without implantation, and the others underwent posterior instrumented fusion. Segmental angular motion was measured at the fused and adjacent levels using dynamic plain lateral film 2 years after operation. Results: The anterior uninstrumented fusion group showed mean 2.0° of segmental angular motion at the fused level compared with mean of 0.8° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). In contrast, at the proximal adjacent level, decreased angular motion (mean 7.7°) was noted in the anterior uninstrumented fusion group compared with mean 11.6° in the posterior instrumented fusion group (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study suggests that differing stiffness of fusion segments could cause different mechanical motion profiles at adjacent segments. © 2009 CIM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. J., Moon, S. H., Chun, H. J., Kang, K. T., Kim, H. S., Moon, E. S., … Lee, H. M. (2009). Comparison of mechanical motion profiles following instrumented fusion and non-instrumented fusion at the L4-5 segment. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v32i1.5089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free