Background: The aim of the study was 2-fold: first, to investigate couples' reasons for not using cryopreserved embryos within the maximum storage period; second, to study their attitudes towards potential embryo donation for specific purposes. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 284 IVF/ICSI couples who experienced destruction of their cryopreserved embryos (n = 1180) because the cryopreservation period exceeded the Danish legislative limit of 24 months. Results: Seventy-four per cent of the couples responded. The main reasons for not utilizing surplus embryos was 'successful delivery' (85%), 'consider family completed' (61%) and 'too short legislative limit for cryopreservation' (59%). Sixty per cent of the couples agreed to the concept of donation of cryopreserved embryos for infertility research, 57% responded affirmatively to donation for stem cell research and 49% for stem cell treatment, but only 29% agreed to the concept of donation to infertile couples. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that delivery of a child after IVF treatment (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.4-10.2) and female age <35 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-6.0) were predictive of agreement to the idea of donation for stem cell research and stem cell treatment respectively; however, male age, duration of infertility, mode of conception JVF or ICSI) and having IVF children were not significant predictors. The following predictive variables were entered into the analysis: female and male age, duration of infertility, IVF versus ICSI, donor semen and +/- IVF children. Conclusions: This study shows that 23% of all couples having cryopreserved embryos do not utilize them for further treatment within the legislative storage period of 2 years. A major reason is successful delivery. More than half of these patients agreed to the concept of donation of surplus outdated embryos for research, whereas less than one-third agreed to donation to other infertile couples. Based on these figures, an alternative utilization of surplus embryos for stem cell research would require a 100-fold larger pool of available embryos to provide a reali stic basis for this purpose. © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Bangsbøll, S., Pinborg, A., Andersen, C. Y., & Andersen, A. N. (2004). Patients’ attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Human Reproduction, 19(10), 2415–2419. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh441
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.