Management, goal alignment, and performance assessment legitimacy: Evidence from the Colombian public sector

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The performance assessment process of public servants, in countries with civil services still in development, usually appears as a formality, instead of a key input of the strategic management process. This situation reduces its legitimacy perception among key organizational actors, leading to a vicious circle in which performance is neither informative nor binding, nor generates positive incentives towards greater performance. This article quantitatively explores the determinants of legitimacy of the performance assessments among Colombian public officials at the subnational level, using data from a large survey of public servants. The authors find that, although transparency portrays a mixed relationship with legitimacy, the role that the managers play, and the level of individual/organizational assessment alignment, are positive determinants of the levels of legitimacy of the performance management system.

References Powered by Scopus

The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future

495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public Management and Educational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Networking

340Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Effect of Managerial Quality

287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A crowding-out of public values? Managerial vs. Weberian values in public sector reform in Latin America

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodas-Gaiter, A., & Sanabria-Pulido, P. (2020). Management, goal alignment, and performance assessment legitimacy: Evidence from the Colombian public sector. Public Administration Issues, (5), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2020-0-5-81-104

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

21%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

33%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

25%

Computer Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free