Surgical prescription of epoetin alfa in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Pre-operative anaemia treatment has been associated with reduced morbidity in joint arthroplasty. This study examined the impact of a surgical prescription of epoetin (EPO) in contemporary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: We conducted a comparative study in a series of 1402 primary THAs performed in patients all having a pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) level documented four to eight weeks before THA surgery. In group A (647 hips), one subcutaneous injection of 40,000 IU EPO once a week for four weeks was prescribed at the discretion of anaesthetist during the pre-operative visit in patients with pre-operative Hb between 10 and 13 g/dl. In group S comprising the remaining 755 hips, an amended EPO therapy including two injections of 20,000 to 40,000 IU was prescribed by the surgeon in patients with Hb less than 12 g/dl deemed at high risks to be transfused following THA. Primary study endpoint was the bleeding index (BI). Results: EPO therapy was delivered in 43 patients (6.7%) in group A and in 26 patients (3.4%) in group S (p = 0.006). The mean total dose of EPO administrated was 115,349 IU in group A versus 75,200 IU in group S (p < 0.001). The mean BI were 2.7 ± 1.0 in group A and 2.8 ± 1.0 g/dl in group S (p = 0.375). No patient was blood-transfused up to post-operative day seven in group S versus five patients in group A (p = 0.021). Conclusions: The amended protocol does not lead to increased peri-operative bleeding. Advances in intra-operative methods to reduce the bleeding allow changing indications of EPO in patients undergoing THA with a low level of Hb.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hourlier, H., & Fennema, P. (2020). Surgical prescription of epoetin alfa in contemporary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study. International Orthopaedics, 44(2), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04399-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free