Preoperative testing: Ethical challenges, evidence-based medicine and informed consent

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Preoperative medical testing for anesthesia and surgery presents certain ethical challenges. Medical evidence suggests that most preoperative testing is unnecessary and may actually harm patients, violating the ethical principle of nonmaleficence. When preoperative testing is done, the anticipated true benefits and possible harms should be disclosed to the patient, as with any medical decision. Certain tests, such as pregnancy and HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) testing require particular care in the informed consent process, because they may be affected by the explicit legal rights of the patient. When patients refuse preoperative testing, the physician should generally respect the patient’s decisions unless it would lead to care that is bizarre, futile, or below published professional standards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Norman, G. A. (2015). Preoperative testing: Ethical challenges, evidence-based medicine and informed consent. In Ethical Issues in Anesthesiology and Surgery (pp. 17–31). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15949-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free