Comparative Study of Fatigue Damage Models Using Different Number of Classes Combined with the Rainflow Method

  • Zengah S
  • Aid A
  • Benguediab M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fatigue damage increases with applied load cycles in a cumulative manner. Fatigue damage models play a key role in life prediction of components and structures subjected to random loading. The aim of this paper is the examination of the performance of the “Damaged Stress Model”, proposed and validated, against other fatigue models under random loading before and after reconstruction of the load histories. To achieve this objective, some linear and nonlinear models proposed for fatigue life estimation and a batch of specimens made of 6082T6 aluminum alloy is subjected to random loading. The damage was cumulated by Miner’s rule, Damaged Stress Model (DSM), Henry model and Unified Theory (UT) and random cycles were counted with a rain-flow algorithm. Experimental data on high-cycle fatigue by complex loading histories with different mean and amplitude stress values are analyzed for life calculation and model predictions are compared.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zengah, S., Aid, A., & Benguediab, M. (2013). Comparative Study of Fatigue Damage Models Using Different Number of Classes Combined with the Rainflow Method. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 3(3), 446–451. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.325

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free