An Axiomatic Design Methodology for Manufacturing Process Selection Based on Multi-User Requirements Mapping

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The fundamental principles of Axiomatic Design involve the systematic analysis, evaluation and transformation of customer needs into product functions with the scope of deriving a set of design parameters and process variables. This paper presents a novel methodology based on the application of axiomatic design theory, with the aim of supporting manufacturing process selection by considering the technological capabilities during manufacturing and the functional requirements of the artefact in hand. The proposed model integrates both functional and non-functional requirements by mapping various stakeholder needs. A case study for a release-buckle mechanism used in a rehabilitation device is presented. Results of an initial qualitative evaluation with medical device designers provide a degree of evidence that the proposed methodology is useful during process selection activities.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

113712Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical device design in context: A model of user-device interaction and consequences

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving the requirements process in Axiomatic Design Theory

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of a multi-user requirements axiomatic design decision support tool for manufacturing process selection

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abela, E., Vella, P., Farrugia, P. J., Cassar, G., Gauci, M. V., & Balzan, E. (2023). An Axiomatic Design Methodology for Manufacturing Process Selection Based on Multi-User Requirements Mapping. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 20(S6), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2023.S6.62-74

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2501234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Decision Sciences 2

40%

Design 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0