The double burden of malnutrition: A systematic review of operational definitions

48Citations
Citations of this article
315Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Despite increasing research on the double burden of malnutrition (DBM; i.e., coexisting over- and undernutrition), there is no global consensus on DBM definitions. Objectives: To identify published operational DBM definitions, measure their frequency of use, and discuss implications for future assessment. Methods: Following a structured search of peer-reviewed articles with terms describing "overnutrition"[e.g., overweight/obesity (OW/OB)] and "undernutrition"(e.g., stunting, micronutrient deficiency), we screened 1920 abstracts, reviewed 500 full texts, and extracted 623 operational definitions from 239 eligible articles. Results: We organized three identified DBM dimensions (level of assessment, target population, and forms of malnutrition) into a framework for building operational DBM definitions. Frequently occurring definitions included coexisting: 1) OW/OB and thinness, wasting, or underweight (n = 289 occurrences); 2) OW/OB and stunting (n = 161); 3) OW/OB and anemia (n = 74); and 4) OW/OB and micronutrient deficiency (n = 73). Conclusions: Existing DBM definitions vary widely. Putting structure to possible definitions may facilitate selection of fit-for-purpose indicators to meet public health priorities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, J. N., Oaks, B. M., & Engle-Stone, R. (2020, September 1). The double burden of malnutrition: A systematic review of operational definitions. Current Developments in Nutrition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa127

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free