The humanistic burden reported by patients diagnosed with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) in Europe

  • Singh P
  • Bennett B
  • Bailey T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: R/M SCCHN is associated with poor prognosis and low survival rate. Further, there is a lack of evidence of how the disease impacts patients’ quality of life (QoL) and ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). This study examines patients’ experience of living with R/M SCCHN. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the EU5 from Jan to May 2019. Medical oncologists recruited patients to complete a survey, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Head and Neck Cancer (FACT-H&N), a 39-item instrument evaluating patients’ QoL (score range 0-148; higher scores indicating better QoL), the European Quality of Life – 5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L; utility scores range -0.59-1, VAS scores 0-100; with higher scores indicating better health status) and questions on daily life impact using a 7-point scale (7= extremely high impact). Physicians also completed a case report form (CRF) for each patient. This analysis is based on interim data. Results: 191 patients completed the survey. Median age was 66 years (45% < 65, 55% ≥ 65), 77% were male, the majority (82%) had an ECOG score 0-1 and 39% required caregiver support for daily needs (mean 32.7 hours per week). At data capture, 9% of patients were in paid work, 21% on sick leave and 48% retired. Most patients (93%) received at least one therapy line following R/M. Patients reported diminished health status, with a mean EQ-5D utility score of 0.62 and a mean VAS score of 58. Mean FACT-H&N score was low at 74.0. Almost half of patients reported high impact (score 5-7) on ADL and family/social life (43% and 46%, respectively). For patients with a lower FACT-H&N score (lowest score quartile [26–60.2]), 75% reported high impact on ADL, versus 15% patients in the highest FACT-H&N score quartile (87.5–120). 81% patients in the lowest FACT-H&N quartile reported high family/social life impact, versus 15% patients in the highest quartile. Conclusions: In addition to considerable impact on health status and QoL, patients report high impact on ability to perform ADL, with a high caregiving burden. There is a clear relationship between reduced QoL and restricted ADL and social life, highlighting the need to consider novel approaches to improve QoL in R/M SCCHN. Legal entity responsible for the study: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosure: P. Singh: Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. B. Bennett: Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. M.C. Contente: Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, P., Bennett, B., Bailey, T., Taylor-Stokes, G., Hennessy, L., Rajkovic, I., & Contente, M. C. (2019). The humanistic burden reported by patients diagnosed with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) in Europe. Annals of Oncology, 30, v473. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz252.063

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free