Evolution of scientific management towards performance measurement and managing systems for sustainable performance in industrial assets: Philosophical point of view

6Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Even though remarkable progress has been made over recent years in the design of performance measurement frameworks and systems, many companies are still primarily relying on traditional financial performance measures. This paper presents an overview of modern descendents and historical antecedents of performance measurement and attempts to give philosophical definition, in fact addressed the evolution of traditional ways of measuring performance. The paper suggests that modern frameworks have indeed addressed the organizations external to them while satisfying the conditions internal to them and providing an analogy of the notion of kuhn's scientific paradigm. This analogy is consistent with the fundamental proposition of Kuhnian philosophy of science, that progress only happens thorough successive and abrupt shifts of paradigm. © JOTMI Research Group.

References Powered by Scopus

Performance measurement: From philosophy to practice

231Citations
646Readers
Get full text
Get full text
118Citations
118Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

13Citations
6Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ratnayake, R. M. C. (2009). Evolution of scientific management towards performance measurement and managing systems for sustainable performance in industrial assets: Philosophical point of view. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 4(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000100014

Readers over time

‘09‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

69%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

18%

Researcher 5

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 38

76%

Engineering 7

14%

Computer Science 3

6%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0