1.1 Exploring the Politico-institutional Dimension of Social Innovation to Repoliticize Urban Governance Arrangements

  • Paidakaki A
  • Moulaert F
  • Van den Broeck P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Paidakaki A, Moulaert F and Van den Broeck P (2018) Exploring the politico-institutional dimension of social innovation to repoliticize urban governance arrangements. In: Franz Y, Blotevogel HH and Danielzyk R (eds) Social Innovation in Urban and Regional Research. Vienna: Verlag der O¨sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 11–22. People are not even aware that they are doing something socially innovative. This statement is a recurring theme when dealing with social innovation (SI) in the academic and policymaking context. Although there is a significant body of literature on social innovation and interdisciplinary research programmes have gained a visible impact1 over time, there seems to be a gap between debating and doing social innovation. Catchwords such as scalability, institutionalization, the third sector and bottom-up practices illustrate the range of interest in SI, while self-organized citizens and grass-roots organisations apply counteracting mechanisms in their daily practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paidakaki, A., Moulaert, F., & Van den Broeck, P. (2018). 1.1 Exploring the Politico-institutional Dimension of Social Innovation to Repoliticize Urban Governance Arrangements. ISR-Forschungsberichte, 47, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1553/isr_fb047s11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free