In this paper, we propose that a sentence like John $$:T$$ ate broccoli $$:F$$ should pragmatically be interpreted as follows: (a) Focus should be interpreted exhaustively; John ate only broccoli; (b) Topic must be interpreted exhaustively: Only John ate (only) broccoli; and (c) The speaker takes it to be possible (or even knows, if he is competent) that at least one alternative of the form x ate y not entailed by the sentence is true. It will be shown that in terms of this analysis we can also account for all the scope-inversion data of Büring (Linguist Philos 20: 175–194, 1997), without giving rise to some of the problems of the latter analysis.
CITATION STYLE
van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2017). Topic, Focus, and Exhaustive Interpretation. In Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (Vol. 91, pp. 63–82). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.