Prospective validation of a predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after routine bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting

9Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The Gatti score is a weighted scoring system based on risk factors for deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) that has been specifically created to predict DSWI risk after routine bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting. It has not undergone an external validation. The aim of the present study was to perform this validation. METHODS BITA grafts were used as skeletonized conduits in 304 (90.7%) of 335 consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery at the authors' institution between January 2014 and July 2015. Baseline characteristics, operative data and immediate outcomes of every patient were prospectively collected in a computerized data registry. A score was assigned to each patient preoperatively. The goodness-of-fit and the discrimination power of both models, preoperative and combined, of the Gatti score were assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the calculation of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, respectively. RESULTS Eighteen (5.9%) patients suffered from DSWI. Major differences were found between the original series whence the Gatti score has been derived and the present prospective series. The Gatti score goodness-of-fit was satisfactory for both the preoperative (P = 0.61) and the combined model (P = 0.81). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.91) for the preoperative model and 0.8 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.9) for the combined model. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the results of the present prospective study, the Gatti score has proved to be effective in predicting DSWI following BITA grafting despite some differences between the original and the present series of patients. More studies have to be performed in order to strengthen the evidence of this first external validation.

References Powered by Scopus

Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach

17383Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems

8382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999

3390Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Deep sternal wound infections: Evidence for prevention, treatment, and reconstructive surgery

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prevention, diagnosis and management of post‐surgical mediastinitis in adults consensus guidelines of the spanish society of cardiovascular infections (Seicav), the spanish society of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (sectcv) and the biomedical research centre network for respiratory diseases (ciberes)

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of closed sternal incision after bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting with a single-use negative pressure system

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gatti, G., Barbati, G., Luzzati, R., Sinagra, G., & Pappalardo, A. (2016). Prospective validation of a predictive scoring system for deep sternal wound infection after routine bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 22(5), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw016

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Researcher 2

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

65%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

12%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0