Is Impact a Measure of Quality? Some Reflections on the Research Quality and Impact Assessment Agendas

  • Yates L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article uses the development of a ‘Research Quality Framework’ in Australia as a focus for reflection on the way in which quality is assessed in relation to education research, and a consideration of the role and situation of a national association of education research in relation to that. The study examines ways in which ‘quality’ and ‘impact’ are being defined in particular practices, and how the broader context of the status of education research impacts on debates and strategies with regard to quality. It is argued that the current focus on measures of quality assessment need to be re-coupled with more attention to contexts of production of education research and the issue of how quality research can be developed. It is argued too that education research associations do need to engage with the quality assessment exercises, but that doing this will pose some real tensions for them.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yates, L. (2005). Is Impact a Measure of Quality? Some Reflections on the Research Quality and Impact Assessment Agendas. European Educational Research Journal, 4(4), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2005.4.4.5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

27%

Researcher 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

60%

Computer Science 2

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

10%

Linguistics 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free