Argumentation and processing knowledge in open-ended assignment tasks: Challenges and accomplishments among pharmacy students

3Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Students in higher education have been shown to have difficulties in developing their critical thinking skills, such as analysis and problem solving, reasoning and argumentation. Open-ended tasks offer opportunities for students to develop their own interpretations of various sources, to critically analyse domain-specific knowledge and utilize that knowledge in their argumentation. This study focuses on the ability of new Master’s students (n=37) to utilize pharmaceutical knowledge from different sources in producing written arguments and counter-arguments in the context of open-ended assignment task. The data were analysed by qualitative content analysis. The results showed that there was substantial variation in how students analysed and processed pharmaceutical knowledge as well as how they utilized that knowledge in their argumentation. While some students were able to provide comprehensive analysis of the different sources, others superficially analysed and processed the sources and struggled to generate convincing arguments. Students’ written responses were typically one-sided: only a few students provided counter-arguments associated with the pharmaceutical problem-solving situation presented in the task. Understanding the nature of the challenges in argumentation and knowledge processing encountered by pharmacy students can help pharmacy educators to modify their pedagogical practices to better support students’ learning. Practitioner Notes 1. University students even in Master program level may have challenges related to argumentation and processing knowledge 2. The challenges in argumentation and processing knowledge should be taken into account and should be enhanced and practiced from the beginning of the studies. 3. Critical thinking and argumentation should be integrated into the intended learning outcomes, learning and teaching activities, the contents of the courses, and assessment.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness

2638Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 Meta-Analysis

551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? An Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education

137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Challenge of Position-Taking in Novice Higher Education Students’ Argumentative Writing

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generic skills in higher education–teachers’ conceptions, pedagogical practices and pedagogical training

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recursivity in source-based writing: a process analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyytinen, H., Siven, M., Salminen, O., & Katajavuori, N. (2021). Argumentation and processing knowledge in open-ended assignment tasks: Challenges and accomplishments among pharmacy students. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(6), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.6.04

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 4

44%

Researcher 3

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

29%

Psychology 2

29%

Mathematics 2

29%

Chemistry 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0