Declassification with explicit reference points

13Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Noninterference requires that public outputs of a program must be completely independent from secrets. While this ensures that secrets cannot be leaked, it is too restrictive for many applications. For instance, the output of a knowledge-based authentication mechanism needs to reveal whether an input matches the secret password. The research problem is to allow such exceptions without giving up too much. Though a number of solutions has been developed, the problem is not yet satisfactorily solved. In this article, we propose a framework to control what information is declassified. Our contributions include a policy language, a semantic characterization of information flow security, and a sound security type system. The main technical novelty is the explicit treatment of so called reference points, which allows us to offer substantially more flexible control of what is released than in existing approaches. © 2009 Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

Protecting privacy using the decentralizedlabel model

414Citations
83Readers

Robust declassification

149Citations
40Readers
Get full text
130Citations
64Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assumptions and guarantees for compositional noninterference

59Citations
30Readers
Get full text

Flexible scheduler-independent security

28Citations
28Readers

Precise enforcement of progress-sensitive security

24Citations
51Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lux, A., & Mantel, H. (2009). Declassification with explicit reference points. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5789 LNCS, pp. 69–85). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04444-1_5

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

74%

Researcher 4

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 27

90%

Physics and Astronomy 1

3%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

3%

Engineering 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0