Representing Structured Clinical Data

  • Nadkarni P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems illustrate all of the challenges of designing and maintaining large systems. In complexity, their database designs rival those of the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) applications. For the large institutional EMRs, the similarity extends to price as well as to the level of institutional commitment required to change your existing processes. When you invest in such a system, you are betting the bank: it’s extremely expensive to change your mind, and deployment failures from ­inadequate customer preparedness can be spectacular. Consider the following issues: • Like ERP applications, EMR systems need to interface with a wide variety of third-party software, and they may even interface with ERP applications for areas such as accounting and inventory. However, in terms of database design, their complexity is of a different type. Specifically, an EMR’s customers will demand the need to capture new kinds of data that may not have existed at the time the EMR was purchased. We consider a couple of these situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nadkarni, P. M. (2011). Representing Structured Clinical Data (pp. 55–73). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-510-1_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free