Incorporating genotypes of relatives into a test of linkage disequilibrium

84Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Genetic data from autosomal loci in diploids generally consist of genotype data for which no phase information is available, making it difficult to implement a test of linkage disequilibrium. In this paper, we describe a test of linkage disequilibrium based on an empirical null distribution of the likelihood of a sample. Information on the genotypes of related individuals is explicitly used to help reconstruct the gametic phase of the independent individuals. Simulation studies show that the present approach improves on estimates of linkage disequilibrium gathered from samples of completely independent individuals but only if some offspring are sampled together with their parents. The failure to incorporate some parents sharply decreases the sensitivity and accuracy of the test. Simulations also show that for multiallelic data (more than two alleles) our testing procedure is not as powerful as an exact test based on known haplotype frequencies, owing to the interaction between departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data

6663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex disease: Fantasy or reality?

307Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure of genetic diversity in the two major gene pools of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae)

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Excoffier, L., & Slatkin, M. (1998). Incorporating genotypes of relatives into a test of linkage disequilibrium. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62(1), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1086/301674

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 35

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

29%

Researcher 20

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61

78%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

6%

Physics and Astronomy 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free