Performance comparison between backpropagation, neuro-fuzzy network, and SVM

7Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, we compare the performance of well-known neural networks, namely, back-propagation (BP) algorithm, Neuro-Fuzzy network and Support Vector Machine (SVM) using the standard three database sets: Wisconsin breast cancer, Iris and wine data. Since such database have been useful for evaluating performance of a group of machine learning algorithms, a series of experiments have been carried out for three algorithms using the cross validation method. Results suggest that SVM outperforms the others and the Neuro-Fuzzy network is better than the BP algorithm for this data set. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. G., Jang, M. S., Cho, K. S., & Park, G. T. (2006). Performance comparison between backpropagation, neuro-fuzzy network, and SVM. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3967 LNCS, pp. 438–446). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11753728_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free