Worker Voice

  • Patmore G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Interest is growing in stimulating improvements in the quality of environmental statements (ESs) /environmental impact statements (EISs) by providing for their systematic review. The different types of organisations and stages in the environmental assessment (EA)/environmental impact assessment (EIA) process at which EIS reviews might be undertaken are analysed. Previous studies relating to EIS review and quality are surveyed. The development of a new Environmental Statement Review Package is detailed and the findings based on its use in reviewing a sample of UK environmental statements are summarised. These suggest that only a minority of such EISs were of satisfactory quality. The possible reasons for poor quality are examined and measures to improve the situation are proposed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patmore, G. (2016). Worker Voice. Worker Voice. Liverpool University Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/oapen_608307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free