Reconsidering India’s climate diplomacy and domestic preferences with a two-level approach

4Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: International climate politics are gradually changing in terms of new and ground-breaking policies and decision-making spearheaded by national governments. The growing global demand to combat climate change reflects the current challenges the world is facing. India’s negotiations at United Nations Conference on Climate Change are based on “equity,” “historical responsibility” and the “polluter pays” agenda, until a shift in the voluntary reduction of carbon emissions takes place. The purpose of this study is to understand why India, a “deal breaker”, is seen as a “deal maker” in climate governance? Design/methodology/approach: For a state like India, domestic preferences are equally important in introducing climate policies alongside its concerns over poverty reduction and economic development, which also stand with its sustainable development goals. This paper explains India’s decision-making using a two-level approach focusing on “domestic preferences.” This rationale is based on India’s historical background as well as new upcoming challenges. Findings: This paper shows that India has both the domestic needs and long-term benefits of combating climate change to cut carbon emissions, which gives the responsibility primarily to domestic audiences and international societies. Originality/value: This paper uses an international political lens to critically analyze India’s climate positions and politics from both domestic and international levels, demonstrating the importance of considering both short- and long-term goals. The outcome benefits not only the policymakers in India but also stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific and beyond.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, J., Zou, X., & Muhkia, A. (2023). Reconsidering India’s climate diplomacy and domestic preferences with a two-level approach. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 15(5), 671–689. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2022-0088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free