Port type is a possible risk factor for implantable venous access port-related bloodstream infections and no sign of local infection predicts the growth of gram-negative bacilli

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Implantable venous access port (IVAP)-related blood stream infections (BSIs) are one of the most common complications of implantable venous ports. The risk factors and pathogens for IVAP-related BSIs are still controversial. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received IVAPs at a Hospital in Taiwan from January 1, 2011 to June 31, 2014. Two types of venous port, BardPort® 6.6 fr (Bard port) and Autosuture Chemosite® 7.5 fr (TYCO port) were used. All patients with clinically proven venous port-related BSIs were enrolled. Results: A total of 552 patients were enrolled. There were 34 episodes of IVAP-related BSIs during the study period for a total incidence of 0.177 events/1000 catheter days. Port type (TYCO vs. Bard, HR=7.105 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.688-29.904), p=0.0075), age>65years (HR=2.320 (95% CI, 1.179-4.564), p=0.0148), and lung cancer (HR=5.807 (95% CI, 2.946-11.447), p<0.001) were risk factors for port infections. We also found that no local sign of infection was significantly associated with the growth of gram-negative bacilli (p=0.031). Conclusions: TYCO venous ports, age>65years, and lung cancer were all significant risk factors for IVAP-related BSIs, and no sign of infection was significantly associated with the growth of gram-negative bacilli.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Device-associated infections: A macroproblem that starts with microadherence

616Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer

395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implantable vascular access systems: Experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems

359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: A review of the literature

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk factors for central line–associated bloodstream infection in pediatric oncology patients with a totally implantable venous access port: A cohort study

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Central line bundle for prevention of central line–associated bloodstream infection for totally implantable venous access devices (ports) in pediatric cancer patients

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hsu, J. F., Chang, H. L., Tsai, M. J., Tsai, Y. M., Lee, Y. L., Chen, P. H., … Yang, C. J. (2015). Port type is a possible risk factor for implantable venous access port-related bloodstream infections and no sign of local infection predicts the growth of gram-negative bacilli. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0707-2

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

48%

Researcher 8

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

77%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

7%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0