Assessment of psychological distress pattern & its correlates among people receiving COVID-19 vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background & objectives: There is a possibility that vaccinated people may experience lesser psychological distress due to the sense of safety felt by them against getting the COVID*19 infection as compared to those who are not vaccinated. However, there is a paucity of research examining the mental health status of this important sub*group of population. Thus, the present study was aimed to examine the pattern of psychological distress and its correlates among people receiving COVID*19 vaccine. Methods: This cross*sectional study assessed individuals receiving COVID*19 vaccine at a tertiary care hospital. Psychological distress and COVID-19-related anxiety were assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the COVID-19 Anxiety Scale-7, respectively. Results: The study comprised 728 individuals with a mean age of 44.8 yr. Moderate levels of depression, anxiety and stress were reported by about 50, six and 15 per cent of the participants, respectively, as assessed on DASS-21. Generalized linear model and quantile regression analyses revealed COVID-19-related anxiety, and being a healthcare worker or front-line worker as significant correlates of psychological distress. Interpretation & conclusions: About half of the study participants receiving COVID-19 vaccine reported moderate to severe symptoms of depression. Strategies focusing on alleviation of COVID-19-related fear and anxiety might be effective in improving the symptoms of psychological distress.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, S., Parija, P. P., Verma, R., Kumar, P., & Chadda, R. K. (2022). Assessment of psychological distress pattern & its correlates among people receiving COVID-19 vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 156(4), 674–680. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_3613_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free