Risky research business: Mathematics education research on the margins

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although we would like to believe that decisions about what research to conduct and how to conduct it are based solely on researcher interest and societal need, the reality is that external political and disciplinary factors do play a role. Scientifically based research (SBR) is one example of external political pressures that shape researcher choice both directly and indirectly. Additionally, disciplines like mathematics education operate under hidden curricula that have the potential to marginalize particular research foci. The purpose of this paper is to consider the implications of such a narrow focus on a young mathematics education researcher's choices about the lines of inquiry that she or he pursues and the ways that she or he manages the risk associated with asking and responding to questions in ways that align with SBR and other disciplinary priorities.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

357Citations
397Readers

This article is free to access.

The Math Wars

224Citations
357Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bullock, E. C. (2015). Risky research business: Mathematics education research on the margins. Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1–3), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1337

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘20‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

82%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 5

45%

Social Sciences 4

36%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0