Analysis of rough and fuzzy clustering

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With the gaining popularity of rough clustering, soft computing research community is studying relationships between rough and fuzzy clustering as well as their relative advantages. Both rough and fuzzy clustering are less restrictive than conventional clustering. Fuzzy clustering memberships are more descriptive than rough clustering. In some cases, descriptive fuzzy clustering may be advantageous, while in other cases it may lead to information overload. This paper provides an experimental comparison of both the clustering techniques and describes a procedure for conversion from fuzzy membership clustering to rough clustering. However, such a conversion is not always necessary, especially if one only needs lower and upper approximations. Experiments also show that descriptive fuzzy clustering may not always (particularly for high dimensional objects) produce results that are as accurate as direct application of rough clustering. We present analysis of the results from both the techniques. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, M., Lingras, P., & Rao, C. R. (2010). Analysis of rough and fuzzy clustering. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6401 LNAI, pp. 679–686). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16248-0_92

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free