Metaphors, domains and embodiment

  • Botha M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Metaphors, domains and embodiment Investigations of metaphorical meaning constitution and meaning (in-) variance have revealed the significance of semantic and semiotic domains and the contexts within which they function as basis for the grounding of metaphorical meaning. In this article some of the current views concerning the grounding of metaphorical meaning in experience and embodiment are explored. My provisional agreement with Lakoff, Johnson and others about the “conceptual” nature of metaphor rests on an important caveat, viz. that this bodily based conceptual structure which lies at the basis of linguistic articulations of metaphor, is grounded in a deeper ontic structure of the world and of human experience. It is the “metaphorical” (actually “analogical”) ontological structure of this grounding that is of interest for the line of argumentation followed in this article.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Botha, M. E. (2005). Metaphors, domains and embodiment. Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v70i3.277

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free