Metaphors, domains and embodiment Investigations of metaphorical meaning constitution and meaning (in-) variance have revealed the significance of semantic and semiotic domains and the contexts within which they function as basis for the grounding of metaphorical meaning. In this article some of the current views concerning the grounding of metaphorical meaning in experience and embodiment are explored. My provisional agreement with Lakoff, Johnson and others about the “conceptual” nature of metaphor rests on an important caveat, viz. that this bodily based conceptual structure which lies at the basis of linguistic articulations of metaphor, is grounded in a deeper ontic structure of the world and of human experience. It is the “metaphorical” (actually “analogical”) ontological structure of this grounding that is of interest for the line of argumentation followed in this article.
CITATION STYLE
Botha, M. E. (2005). Metaphors, domains and embodiment. Koers - Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 70(3). https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v70i3.277
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.