Is crowdsourcing patient-reported outcomes the future of evidence-based medicine?: A case study of back pain

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evidence is lacking for patient-reported effectiveness of treatments for most medical conditions and specifically for lower back pain. In this paper, we examined a consumer-based social network that collects patients’ treatment ratings as a potential source of evidence. Acknowledging the potential biases of this data set, we used propensity score matching and generalized linear regression to account for confounding variables. To evaluate validity, we compared results obtained by analyzing the patient reported data to results of evidence-based studies. Overall, there was agreement on the relationship between back pain and being obese. In addition, there was agreement about which treatments were effective or had no benefit. The patients’ ratings also point to new evidence that postural modification treatment is effective and that surgery is harmful to a large proportion of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peleg, M., Leung, T. I., Desai, M., & Dumontier, M. (2017). Is crowdsourcing patient-reported outcomes the future of evidence-based medicine?: A case study of back pain. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10259 LNAI, pp. 245–255). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59758-4_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free