In the past decade, the techniques of quantitative PCR (qPCR) and reverse transcription (RT)-qPCR have become accessible to virtually all research labs, producing valuable data for peer-reviewed publications and supporting exciting research conclusions. However, the experimental design and validation processes applied to the associated projects are the result of historical biases adopted by individual labs that have evolved and changed since the inception of the techniques and associated technologies. This has resulted in wide variability in the quality, reproducibility and interpretability of published data as a direct result of how each lab has designed their RT-qPCR experiments. The 'minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments' (MIQE) was published to provide the scientific community with a consistent workflow and key considerations to perform qPCR experiments. We use specific examples to highlight the serious negative ramifications for data quality when the MIQE guidelines are not applied and include a summary of good and poor practices for RT-qPCR. © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.
CITATION STYLE
Taylor, S. C., & Mrkusich, E. M. (2014). The state of RT-quantitative PCR: Firsthand observations of implementation of minimum information for the publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments (MIQE). Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356189
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.