Paradoxical Urbanism: Anti-Urban Currents in Modern Urbanism

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Modernist urbanism seems progressive, even Utopian: design for a better world through a democratic and humane built environment. But two currents undermine this vision from within: an Arcadianism which turns to a rural idyll as retreat from change and the effects of industrialization; and an instrumentalism by which the humane vision becomes prescriptive and anti-democratic. Malcolm Miles argues that these two currents undermine modernism’s progressive vision. This book examines the roots of modernist urbanism in the seamless, self-contained systems of Cartesian space; and identifies contradictions within modernist urbanism in its instrumentalism and reliance on de-politicised professional expertise. Miles adroitly reviews the postmodern culture of industrial ruinscapes; and posits that if cities are to be places of proximity, diversity, mobility and agency, this will require a move from modernist instrumentalism to a creative and radically democratic co-production of the built environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miles, M. (2020). Paradoxical Urbanism: Anti-Urban Currents in Modern Urbanism. Paradoxical Urbanism: Anti-Urban Currents in Modern Urbanism (pp. 1–128). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6341-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free