Burying indigeneity: The spatial construction of reality and Aboriginal Australia

25Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article we argue that spatial distance and historic socio-ethnic boundaries play a critical role in determining the relative priority given to groups that are marginally placed. These priorities are materialized through law. We utilize theories that understand 'reality' as something socially constructed: our impressions of the structure of everyday life are mediated in large part by our primary social group interactions. We profile the spatial distribution and relative segregation of Indigenous Australians, from urban to remote regional contexts. Our data highlights how even a predominantly urban Indigenous population remains out of the sight and mind of social and political actors due to its small numerical size and perceived social difference. We move to explain public policy formulation in terms of orientations that are influenced by the spatiality of social affiliations. We suggest that the spatially-bounded patterning of black and white lives supports the continued burial of Indigenous life. The socio-spatial construction of Indigenous life for white and other Australians has enabled both aggressive and neglectful policy instruments in which Aboriginal life appears as something that is politically, legally and spatially marginal. © The Author(s) 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atkinson, R., Taylor, E., & Walter, M. (2010). Burying indigeneity: The spatial construction of reality and Aboriginal Australia. Social and Legal Studies, 19(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909345449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free